3am rants
... I need a new phone.
This is getting serious. I was stuck on a bus for 2.5 hours without texting. and I still have to answer the all important question of 'how do you say 'like' in hebrew.'... eh.
Drunk people are pathetic.
I hate relationships where you have to force yourself to talk to the person.
Shouldn't it be effortless?
Shouldn't I want it to work?
Why are the Republicans going to lose Congress gosh darnit!
posted by Lost @ 3:11 AM
12 comments
12 Comments:
answering rhetorical Q's in order
1. like in hebrew = no clue
2. texting= expensive and addictive
3. drunk ppl= happier then the rest of us
4. relationships = require effort. At times you dont want to speak to other person and vice versa but you do it anyways.
5. If the repubs lose it makes no difference as the president will veto everything they pass anyways.
I am so sick of both parties.
rock on.
I actually found an answer to the like question - (ani michovevet (sp) and #4- to be debated
and I guess I shd welcome uou back to blogsphere!
Thanks. I just have less time etc etc.
Number 4 is really more of a situational thing. I wasnt reffering to a guy/girl relationship only.
In a guy/girl type relationship you do kind of need that excitement to see and talk again. Unless there is physical contact. Thats the only way to really keep a relationship going long term.
Also the relationship has to be durable outside of a "setting" where you met. That includes school, work, camp, karate class, whatever.
The ONLY WAY to keep it going long term?
eh. palpable disagreement right there. I would think it would shorten the relationship.
I cant say i have experience, but when people date, there is an excitement that keeps them wanting to continue. After some time, maybe a month or three if there is no physical connection a status quo is established, and the original excitement is hard to recapture.
I agree that its best to first establish an emotional conection, but a physical connection is needed to further the relationship. That can be through marriage as well.
I agree that it shortens it when the foundation is based on physical stuff.
Though as Im sure you noticed. I have zero experience. Despite my intracite hotness. so take it with a grain of salt.
I also disagree with you on drunk guys.
Drunks girls, as I have recently discovered, are dangerous beings.
O. shoot. I wrote a whole long comment hours ago on a school computer. Noooo where did it go?!
Alrighty. I said all this with a lot more oomph.
Physical attraction could work in jumpstarting a relationship - obviously. But if there is actual physical contact constantly... in my personal opinion, relationship = gonzo.. - which is basically what you said.
And being a girl, I can say that drunk guys are almost always pathetic and half a shell of their normal sober selves... girls are just freaky and generally promiscuous.
And apparently I was a tree hugger when I registered to vote 2 yrs ago.. my mom told me i'm a registered Demo. So I don't get to vote in the primaries for the party I stand by.. quite depressing as I have newly acquired a love for the neo-cons.
lol....rants are the best
fo sho.
Yes drunk girls are pretty loose. Im not complainng. Though the loose girls are even looser.
I just hate politics now. I hate the neo-cons for saying and preaching one thing and doing another. I hate the dems to.
I registered as a Dem too, its a chiyuv to get the arafat loving Clinton out of the senate as soon as possible. That supid carpet bagging byatch.
As for the relationship thing, being that i know noting about that, Ill shut up now.
umm, no where is it?
Michelle - ask BB to show you!!
Post a Comment
<< Home